New digital parking stations confuse Haligonians, but city says changes on the way

The Halifax municipality has been receiving complaints around user interface issues

Longtime Halifax resident Shirley Tillotson had to start over several times before she could figure out how to get one of the new parking stations to work.

“It was frustrating and annoying,” said Tillotson.

She said the buttons to move to the next screen were not always the same, or in the same location. There would be a key under a tab, then a button that says ‘next,’ or a checkmark — each time signalling the action to proceed.

“At each point you’re asked for the same thing, but there’s different keys now,” said Tillotson.

Tillotson is not alone in her frustration around the new parking stations that were first rolled out in August.

Davis McPhee is a software developer at computer consulting firm Garvin-Allen Solutions, and works with user interface (UI) design. The Signal reached McPhee for comment on the parking stations.

He said the current model would “definitely cause some confusion.”

McPhee said common practice in UI design is to make mock-ups of layouts in Photoshop, and have users test them before even beginning development on the software.

“That way you’re working much less on assumption about how a user interface would work, and more on data about how they do,” said McPhee.

McPhee said working with users every step of the way is key.

Halifax residents have complained about the layout of the parking stations user interface.   Nathan Horne

The city says they have listened to the feedback, and will be implementing changes.

Victoria Horne, manager of parking services for the Halifax Regional Municipality, said they have been receiving complaints since the initial rollout in August.

She said the contractor had provided a best-practices informed screen sequence, which saw success in other jurisdictions.

“The interesting thing is it’s just not working here,” she said.

Horne said the city plans to continue to work with the contractor, Precise ParkLink, on changes to the parking station’s UI as more user feedback comes in.

These tweaks are all free of charge under the city’s agreement with the contractor, Horne said.

Regional council had approved a $4.5-million budget for the project, which Horne noted is “on time and under budget.”

She cited the COVID-19 pandemic as a contributing factor in the issues people are having.

“We had no street teams of staff and volunteers who would walk people through the use of the stations,” she said.

However, Horne said that because of the pandemic the rollout was also possibly less bumpy than it may have otherwise. Smaller crowds and fewer tourists meant that issues were experienced on a smaller scale, she said, making for a smoother transition.

In the meantime, as changes are made to the UI design of the stations, the city has upped its 311 resources for user issues. They are also working towards installing a step-by-step guide on the stations themselves.

Nathan Horne

Nathan Horne

Nathan Horne is a journalist interested in breaking stories that highlight the inequalities and injustices in society.

Have a story idea? Let us know


  1. Easier to pay the fine than figure out machines.
    I taught computer courses for years and I find them very confusing.

    I asked a police officer to help me and he couldn’t work the machine, but he knew how to fill out parking fine.

    I can’t imagine how seniors or those with no digital experience can manage. HRM must be making a great profit off parking fines

  2. No doubt there will be some issues with the tech at first but these are already in 200+ cities and counties around the world and using these pay stations has opened up way more parking spaces than there was before and as far as not leaving time for someone else why would you want that? With the app you can actually pause your time session and keep all that time to be used agian instead of giving it away! Awsome! Also we still have some of the cheapest parking rates in the country. Was paying 16$ an hour in Edmonton in 2009. My seven year old can use the pay station with no issues….just sayin..

  3. These are brutal. All previous concerns valid (difficult to use, confusing, not fluid and logical); buttons take too much pressure to activate. Very bad idea, and particularly during Covid – having to press your finger firmly into a greasy button smeared with other people’s germs.

    I find it very hard to believe that there was “…success in other jurisdictions.”, and it would be interesting to see what their definition of “success.”

  4. Not that I needed it. One last reason to avoid downtown. The beggars have me not stepping foot on Spring Garden road in over 6 years

  5. I stopped going downtown – parking is a big part of the issue. Life uptown is easier and no marking meters.

  6. I have had to use those screens many times as I work contract work through out the city, after the torture and time consumed standing inputting, restarting the process on every machine I have had to use I have opted to pay the parking fine.
    Meters have a slot to return change, they never do so, the 2.00 hr charge jumps higher if your work time estimate sees you needing more than 2hrs. You can no longer leave time you payed to the next user – city has to love that, people overlap paying for the same space, standing in rain, snow, high winds to punch numbers instead of quickly slipping a few coins down a slot.
    I have been advised to use my phone, credit card, the computer program they introduced with the old meters, which I did but was unsatisfactory even with the old meters.
    Seniors, disabled, tourists, anyone who chooses not to embrace technology and they are out there, will be subjected to a very flawed system because the city can earn much more money per spot.

    1. i believe there is currently a class act lawsuit in montreal over this exact issue of time remaining not carrying over and thus double charging for the space ie: woo-hoo free parking! is now a thing of the past

Comments are closed.