Canada will expand medically-assisted death to patients with mental disorders. The amendments are scheduled to take effect on March 17, 2023.
Image Caption Icon

‘Scared for a lot of people’: Dal student says assisted-dying expansion could hurt the mentally ill

Changes also criticized by Halifax bioethicist who quit euthanasia committee

A Dalhousie student who survived a suicide attempt says Parliament’s decision to expand access to medically-assisted death could endanger Canadians who have mental disorders.

Anaïs Pierre-Estimé says she might have requested an assisted death had she been eligible while she was struggling with depression and suicidal thoughts.

“If that was available, and I was at a really bad place, I could have gone through with it,” she told The Signal from Halifax, where she is studying marine biology.

Medical assistance in dying, or MaiD for short, allows for a doctor or a nurse practitioner to administer a lethal dose of drugs to people with a “serious and incurable illness, disease or disability”.

The law is set to expand on March 17, 2023 to include people with mental disorders whose conditions are not inherently deadly. Pierre-Estimé expressed concerns about the change.

Dalhousie marine biology student Anaïs Pierre-Estimé
Dalhousie marine biology student Anaïs Pierre-Estimé says she might have sought an assisted death had she been eligible while she was struggling with depression and suicidal thoughts.   Anaïs Pierre-Estimé/Contributed

“Having that option out, it’s very dangerous,” she said. “Especially someone who’s not being surveilled by a doctor or not receiving the help they need.”

Pierre-Estimé attempted suicide at 14, continues to battle depression as an adult and said she understands how someone with mental-health issues could request MAiD.

“As someone that really struggled to see my own worth, I know that a lot of people … struggle with that on a day-to-day basis.”

Assessment criteria challenged

The Expert Panel on MAiD and Mental Illness, charged with reviewing Canada’s assisted-dying law, asserted in May that people with mental disorders are not necessarily “at significant risk of attempted or completed suicide.” The panel went on to write that some people can be suicidal even if they don’t have mental disorders.

A prominent dissenter on the panel was retired Dalhousie bioethicist Dr. Jeff Kirby, who quit the committee in April, citing inadequate safeguards.

In an interview with The Signal in late November, the former physician-psychotherapist said the panel should have recommended additional legal protections for mentally-ill Canadians.

Former Dalhousie University bioethicist Dr. Jeff Kirby
Retired Dalhousie bioethicist Dr. Jeff Kirby quit the federal assisted-dying committee, citing inadequate safeguards for people with mental disorders.   Jeff Kirby/contributed

Kirby said he disagrees with the fact that decisions on who qualifies for assisted death can be at the discretion of two MAiD “assessors” who could be a family doctor or a nurse.

“They don’t have any training in psychiatry,” said Kirby. “And they believe they are qualified to do
that. I contend they are not.”

Kirby also expressed misgivings about MAiD assessor training, which uses modules. He said modules are not an adequate resource to teach people how to make end-of-life decisions for patients with mental disorders.

“If you took a general practitioner and they went through these modules, it would not train them, in my mind, to do assessments.”

MAiD panel criticized

In previous media interviews, Kirby has been critical of the national committee tasked with safeguarding Canada’s MAiD law.

He said the chair, Dr. Mona Gupta, is a nationally-recognized supporter of expanded access to medically-assisted death. As well, Kirby said the committee tried to stop members with opposing views from raising their concerns and was not transparent in reporting dissent.

Although the committee’s final report included additional safety protocols, they were recommendations rather than law and Kirby told The Signal that he quit rather than endorse the report.

“I couldn’t sign off on it in good conscience.”

MAiD group denies slippery slope

A group that advocates for assisted-dying rights has backed the upcoming changes to the MAiD law.

James Cowan, a lawyer for Dying with Dignity Canada, told The Signal that widened access to doctor-assisted death would not likely lead to a spike in assisted deaths among mentally-ill Canadians.

James Cowan, lawyer for the assisted-dying advocacy group Dying with Dignity Canada.
James Cowan of Dying With Dignity Canada says wrongful-death safeguards must be balanced against assisted-death rights for Canadians with mental disorders.   James Cowan/Contributed

“The safeguards that are in place are adequate,” he said. “The idea that simply because you’re mentally ill, you’ll be entitled to access MAiD is simply not right.”

Cowan says while it’s important to have safeguards that prevent wrongful death, he added it’s also crucial that Canadians with mental disorders have access to medically-assisted death.

“We know there are people who, the cause of their suffering is mental illness and it’s enduring,” he said. “It’s not going to get any better. They shouldn’t be discriminated against because the cause of their suffering is a mental rather than physical cause.”

‘I’m worthy of living’

Anaïs Pierre-Estimé said she regrets everything she did to hurt herself and has since accessed mental-health services at university to get things back on track. Aside from her studies, she enjoys weightlifting and dancing.

“I’m worthy of living,” she said. “What depression can make you think, is not the final solution.”

She had hid her negative thoughts from people in her life prior to attempting suicide and says others who do the same could be vulnerable under the new changes to MAiD in Canada.

“You really don’t know what’s going through someone’s mind. I’m scared for a lot of people.”

Related Websites

Connor McDowell

Connor McDowell

Writes about behaviour and policy.

Have a story idea? Let us know

1 comment

  1. —-“We know there are people who, the cause of their suffering is mental illness and it’s enduring,” he said. “It’s not going to get any better. They shouldn’t be discriminated against because the cause of their suffering is a mental rather than physical cause.”

    What we know about the illnesses we call “mental” (long habit) is far less than we know about the illnesses we do not describe as “mental”. What we have researched about the illnesses we call “mental”, i.e., of the mind, is far less than what we have researched about other illnesses.

    Simply calling them “mental” has a ring of bias. They are real. They, like other illnesses, exist in degree, and like other illnesses can devastate.

    Harold A Maio, retired mental health editor

Comments are closed.